The Mental Architecture of Strength - Episode V: Confidence, Self-Efficacy and the Ability to Perform Under Pressure

Abstract

In strongman, confidence is often described in simple terms: believe you can, step onto the platform and execute. Performance psychology shows a more nuanced picture. Self-efficacy is the belief that one can organize and execute the actions required for a specific task. It is not identical to general optimism or global self-esteem.

A 2023 meta-analysis of 44 articles and 55 independent samples found a positive, moderate relationship between pre-event self-efficacy and sports performance (r = 0.31), while also showing prediction intervals that could include both facilitating and impairing effects. In other words, more confidence does not automatically guarantee better performance.

1. Introduction - The Moment When You Have to Believe Before You Prove It

Before an event there is a fraction of time in which the result does not yet exist. The implement has not moved. The clock has not started. The athlete has only what has been built in preparation and a mental representation of what is about to happen.

That is where confidence enters. Not as psychological magic, but as an expectation of one's ability to execute. In a sport built around difficult attempts, the difference between “I think I can” and “I know what I need to do” can become highly consequential.

2. Self-Efficacy Is Not the Same as General Confidence

Self-efficacy is task-specific. An athlete may have very high confidence in deadlifting but lower self-efficacy for a technical carry or unfamiliar event. This specificity matters.

In strongman, events and implements vary. It is therefore not enough to think “I am strong.” The more useful question is “Can I execute this event, under these conditions, with this technique and this load?”

3. What Research Says About Confidence and Performance

The literature does not support the idea that confidence automatically produces performance. A meta-analysis of self-confidence and performance included 41 articles, 3,711 athletes and 24 sports and found an average association of r = 0.25. The relationship was stronger in individual sports and when performance was measured objectively.

This is particularly relevant to strongman: confidence matters, but it cannot replace strength, technique, preparation or physiological capacity.

4. Confidence Built Through Experience

One of the strongest sources of self-efficacy is direct mastery experience. When an athlete successfully performs a difficult task, the brain receives concrete information: this action is possible.

Progress therefore builds more than muscle. It builds evidence. A personal record, a successfully repeated event, stable technique under fatigue and a well-managed competition become psychological reference points for the next challenge.

5. Confidence Does Not Need to Wait for Perfection

An athlete can become trapped in a loop: “I will be confident when I am good enough.” The problem is that difficult performance sometimes requires action before certainty is available.

Mature confidence does not say “I will definitely succeed.” It says “I have sufficient reasons to believe I can execute, and I am prepared to respond if the task becomes difficult.”

6. Preparation Produces Evidence, Not Just Hope

The most robust confidence is reality-based. If an athlete has repeated an event, practiced technique, simulated pressure and tested capacity in conditions close to competition, he has concrete information on which to rely.

This turns confidence from an emotion into a provisional judgment based on evidence. “I have done this in training” is a more robust source than “I feel invincible today.”

7. Confidence and Competitive Pressure

Competition changes the meaning of a weight. In training, a missed attempt can be feedback. In competition, it can change the standings. Stakes alter attention, physiological activation and the way the athlete interprets each signal.

Functional confidence does not eliminate pressure. It allows the athlete to keep executing in its presence.

8. Arousal Is Not the Enemy

An athlete may enter competition with an elevated heart rate, faster breathing, muscular tension and a strong sense of activation. These reactions do not automatically mean performance will be poor.

Interpretation matters. If activation is interpreted as “I am scared, so I will fail,” anxiety may increase. If it is interpreted as “my body is preparing for effort,” it may become easier to manage.

9. Confidence and Attention

Pressure can narrow or fragment attention. The athlete starts monitoring opponents, spectators, rankings, the weight, the judge and his own sensations simultaneously.

Functional confidence allows a return to the task. You do not need to control everything happening around you. You need to control the next relevant action.

10. When Confidence Becomes Overconfidence

Excessive confidence can produce evaluation errors. An athlete may underestimate an opponent, ignore a problematic event or approach a load without sufficient respect.

Research on self-efficacy shows this nuance: the effect is not uniformly positive. Belief in one's ability needs to remain connected to competence and realistic assessment of the situation.

11. Confidence Does Not Mean Having No Emotions

A common strength-sport myth is that a mentally strong athlete does not feel fear. In reality, absence of emotion is not a realistic criterion for performance.

You can have emotions and execute. You can feel uncertain and follow the plan. You can respect the weight without turning it into a threat. Confidence is compatible with emotional vulnerability.

12. Fear and Confidence Can Coexist

Fear signals that the outcome matters or that a risk is perceived. Confidence says that you have resources with which to respond. The two are not mutually exclusive.

An experienced athlete can enter an event with respect and tension without allowing those states to dictate behavior. That is the difference between emotion and command.

13. Sources of Self-Efficacy

In Bandura's theory, self-efficacy is informed by mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasion and interpretation of physiological and emotional states. In sport, all four can matter.

Watching a teammate perform an event can show that the task is possible. A credible coach can provide feedback. A successful training session can become direct evidence. Correctly interpreting adrenaline can prevent activation from becoming panic.

14. The Coach's Role in Building Confidence

Coach feedback can be an important source of information, but it should be specific. “You are very good” is pleasant, while “your start position remained stable under 90% of the load” is more useful for self-efficacy.

Confidence is built more effectively from observable competencies than from generic praise. The athlete needs to know what he can do, not merely hear that he is good.

15. Confidence and the Memory of Success

After an important success, it is useful to preserve a record of the conditions that contributed. What did you do beforehand? How did you breathe? What internal cue did you use? What did you notice technically?

Success then becomes reproducible information rather than an isolated emotional photograph.

16. Failure Can Build or Destroy Confidence

Failure does not have a single psychological meaning. If it is interpreted as proof that “I am not made for this,” self-efficacy may decline. If it is interpreted as information about a specific problem, it can produce adjustment.

The difference is between identity and task. “I did not lift this weight” is an observation. “I am not a real strongman” is a verdict. The first can be useful. The second can become a trap.

17. Confidence After a Poor Competition

After a poor competition, the temptation is to repair the result psychologically with an opposite declaration: “next time I will destroy everyone.” But confidence is not repaired through the intensity of a promise.

It is repaired by identifying the cause, adjusting the plan and accumulating new evidence of competence. Confidence is rebuilt through behavior.

18. Visualization: Useful, but Not Magic

Imagery can be used to mentally rehearse execution, competitive context and responses to difficult situations. It does not replace physical preparation.

The most useful imagery is not only the medal. It is the sequence: enter, set position, execute, difficulty appears, remain in the plan, finish. The mind rehearses the process rather than only the outcome.

19. Self-Talk and Internal Commands

Internal language can direct attention. Under pressure, short phrases are often more functional than long motivational speeches.

“Breathe.” “Set.” “Hold.” “Execute.” These do not create force from nothing. They reduce noise and return attention to relevant behavior.

20. Confidence and Control

One of the most useful forms of confidence is knowing what you can control. You cannot control the opponent, judge, temperature, crowd or the load selected by the organizer.

You can control preparation, warm-up, breathing, technique, strategy and your response after an error. The more attention moves toward these elements, the less mental space external pressure occupies.

21. Confidence Under Fatigue

Confidence can look different when the body is tired. An execution that felt easy in the first event may become difficult after several hours of competition.

Here confidence in the process matters. You do not need to feel as energetic as you did at the start. You need to know that you have a procedure you can follow when perceived effort rises.

22. Confidence in Unfamiliar Events

Strongman sometimes includes implements, events or combinations that cannot be perfectly reproduced in the gym. In those situations, confidence cannot come from total familiarity.

It can come from transferable skills: the ability to learn quickly, adjust position, read the implement, conserve energy and remain calm when something is different.

23. Confidence and Competition With an Opponent

Comparing yourself with opponents can motivate, but it can also distract. Constantly trying to predict what another athlete will do consumes cognitive resources.

A more robust model is to use the ranking as information rather than identity. The opponent can change strategy. You must remain capable of executing your own event.

24. Confidence and Calculated Risk

In competition, athletes sometimes choose between a conservative attempt and an aggressive one. Confidence does not automatically mean choosing the heavier option.

Mature confidence allows risk to be evaluated without ego. You may choose a safer weight for points or attack when the standings justify it. The decision should serve the objective, not the athlete's image.

25. Confidence and Consistency

An athlete can have one extraordinary day and still lack consistency. High-level performance requires repeatability.

Useful confidence is confidence that you can reproduce a process, not merely confidence that you can have one memorable day. This connects confidence to the previous episode on discipline: what you repeat becomes what you can reasonably anticipate.

26. How Confidence Is Trained

Confidence can be developed through progressive goals, simulations, specific feedback, logging successful performances and gradual exposure to situations that create pressure.

The difficulty should be sufficient to create adaptation without becoming so chaotic that every attempt turns into a lottery. The athlete needs to accumulate evidence of competence.

27. The Formula: Not “I Know I Will Succeed,” but “I Know How I Will Respond”

Perhaps the most robust form of confidence is not certainty about the outcome. It is confidence in the response. If the weight feels heavy, I know what to do. If the crowd becomes loud, I return to the routine. If the first attempt fails, I analyze and adjust. If pressure appears, I breathe and execute.

This form of confidence survives uncertainty because it does not depend on controlling the outcome. It depends on competence in responding.

28. Conclusions

Confidence is a genuine component of strongman performance, but it is neither a mystical force nor a guarantee. Research indicates positive relationships between self-efficacy, self-confidence and performance, but effects are moderate and depend on task, context and measurement.

For a strongman athlete, the strongest confidence is built from evidence: training, experience, technique, simulations, feedback and the ability to respond to failure. You do not need to step onto the platform convinced that nothing can stop you. You need to step on convinced that you can remain functional when things become difficult.

The mature mindset does not say “I will definitely win.” It says: “I am prepared, I know what I can control, and I will execute what I have built.” At that point, confidence is no longer a mask. It becomes an extension of preparation.

References

Lochbaum, M., Sisneros, C., Cooper, S., & Terry, P. C. (2023). Pre-Event Self-Efficacy and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports, 11(11), 222. DOI: 10.3390/sports11110222.

Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(3), 280-294. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2000.10608908.

Machida, M., & Schaubroeck, J. (2022). Revisiting the Self-Confidence and Sport Performance Relationship: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6381. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116381.

López-Rodríguez, L., et al. (2025). Self-Efficacy in High-Performance Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 18(1), 116-143. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2025.0107.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.

Woodman, T., & Hardy, L. (2003). The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and self-confidence upon sport performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(6), 443-457. DOI: 10.1080/0264041031000101809.